Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Standardise the variable for including eclasses only once | ||
| Date: | Mon, 07 Jul 2014 14:05:11 | ||
| Message-Id: | lpe9d6$os0$1@ger.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Standardise the variable for including eclasses only once by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On 07/04/2014 07:26 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 | > I have no strong preference for the variable's value. Is testing for |
| 3 | > a non-empty value sufficient? Then we should assign something simple |
| 4 | > (like "1"). If not, any string that is sufficiently random (like the |
| 5 | > one used in eutils) should be good. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I believe vapier introduced the original check and random value, so |
| 8 | perhaps he knows. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Standardise the variable for including eclasses only once | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |