| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
cilly wrote: |
| 5 |
> I also recommend to manage hard-masked packages the same way, it |
| 6 |
> prevents confusion in |
| 7 |
> bug-reports. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I don't agree for hard-masked packages. Sometimes they are hard-masked |
| 10 |
because of being under development, and are changed several times until |
| 11 |
unmasked (think about new KDE versions etc). Revbumping with each change |
| 12 |
and then finally unmasking something like -r15 is nuissance and looks |
| 13 |
weird. Users shouldn't be using p.masked packages and if they do, they |
| 14 |
should really know what they are doing, especially when filling bugs for |
| 15 |
such packages as there are no guarantees while in p.mask. |
| 16 |
- -- |
| 17 |
Vlastimil Babka (Caster) |
| 18 |
Gentoo/Java |
| 19 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 20 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) |
| 21 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iD8DBQFGboh4tbrAj05h3oQRAvv1AJ45RRl0kr1246ug5H1ZdSTZ5i5j5QCfaq25 |
| 24 |
xLWsB9Pqbb8kPXVSe4Co4NM= |
| 25 |
=SSi6 |
| 26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives