Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Manuel Rüger" <mrueg@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Requiring gentoo.git committers to use their @gentoo.org address
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 20:12:32
Message-Id: 04e6294c-c109-761b-a991-73f409eb3aae@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Requiring gentoo.git committers to use their @gentoo.org address by "Michał Górny"
1 On 09.07.2018 10:40, Michał Górny wrote:
2 > Hi,
3 >
4 > We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail addresses
5 > for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of
6 > developers is using their @gentoo.org e-mail addresses. However, a few
7 > developers are using some other addresses.
8 >
9 > Using non-@g.o e-mail addresses generally causes problems
10 > in accounting for commits. For example, our retirement scripts can't
11 > detect commits made using non-Gentoo e-mail address. My dev-timeline
12 > scripts [1] account for all emails in LDAP (which doesn't cover all
13 > addresses developers use). FWIK gkeys accounts for all addresses
14 > in the OpenPGP key UIDs. In my opinion, that's a lot of hoops to jump
15 > through to workaround bad practice.
16 >
17 > Therefore, I'd like to start enforcing (at the level of the hook
18 > verifying signatures) that all commits made to gentoo.git (and other
19 > repositories requiring dev signatures) are made using @gentoo.org e-mail
20 > address (for committer field).
21 >
22 > Is anyone opposed to that? Does anyone know of a valid reason to use
23 > non-@g.o address when committing?
24 >
25 > [1]:https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/dev-timeline.html
26 >
27
28 Hi Michał,
29
30 just to be clear on the wording, are you talking about the author email
31 of a git commit (authorship) or the comitter email to the upstream git
32 repository (committer)?
33
34 Thanks,
35 Manuel

Replies