1 |
On 09.07.2018 10:40, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail addresses |
5 |
> for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of |
6 |
> developers is using their @gentoo.org e-mail addresses. However, a few |
7 |
> developers are using some other addresses. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Using non-@g.o e-mail addresses generally causes problems |
10 |
> in accounting for commits. For example, our retirement scripts can't |
11 |
> detect commits made using non-Gentoo e-mail address. My dev-timeline |
12 |
> scripts [1] account for all emails in LDAP (which doesn't cover all |
13 |
> addresses developers use). FWIK gkeys accounts for all addresses |
14 |
> in the OpenPGP key UIDs. In my opinion, that's a lot of hoops to jump |
15 |
> through to workaround bad practice. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Therefore, I'd like to start enforcing (at the level of the hook |
18 |
> verifying signatures) that all commits made to gentoo.git (and other |
19 |
> repositories requiring dev signatures) are made using @gentoo.org e-mail |
20 |
> address (for committer field). |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Is anyone opposed to that? Does anyone know of a valid reason to use |
23 |
> non-@g.o address when committing? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> [1]:https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/dev-timeline.html |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
Hi Michał, |
29 |
|
30 |
just to be clear on the wording, are you talking about the author email |
31 |
of a git commit (authorship) or the comitter email to the upstream git |
32 |
repository (committer)? |
33 |
|
34 |
Thanks, |
35 |
Manuel |