| 1 |
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> However, does this mean the hardened kernel package must stay in ~arch |
| 3 |
> since it's technically the testing version? Or would we keyword it |
| 4 |
> based on our own findings of stability? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I'd recommend that the team does whatever adds the most value. If it |
| 7 |
doesn't want to do QA on released versions then I suggest it all stay |
| 8 |
as ~arch. If you're going to do your own QA I don't see why you can't |
| 9 |
mark versions as stable - just make it clear to users what stable |
| 10 |
means. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
BTW, while they're only tracking the most recent stable branch of the |
| 13 |
kernel, they ARE tracking a stable branch, and not mainline. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Rich |
Archives