| 1 |
On December 25, 2016 9:49:02 PM GMT+09:00, Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
>On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 13:41:29 +0100 |
| 3 |
>Agostino Sarubbo <ago@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> NOTE: I'm intending this message as a sort of announcement to invite |
| 6 |
>everyone |
| 7 |
>> to port their stable requests. I guess there isn't much to discuss |
| 8 |
>here. If |
| 9 |
>> you don't like some of the changes that have been done, please open a |
| 10 |
>specific |
| 11 |
>> thread about. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> Thanks. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
>A quick rundown on attaching stabilization lists as files might be |
| 16 |
>helpful, |
| 17 |
>especially in regards to that flag having three states, the "undefined" |
| 18 |
>state (ie: no such flag) |
| 19 |
>, and both "-" and "+" states. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
It is not necessary to use a file now. Just put the list in the "Atoms to stabilize" as described. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
>Also steps to take in regards to getting a "Flags: sanitycheck-" report |
| 26 |
>should be clarified. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
>( I assume these will all be in the wiki, I'm just jotting them here |
| 29 |
>under the |
| 30 |
>presumption that the content of this email and its replies will be used |
| 31 |
>as a baseline |
| 32 |
>for the wiki ) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Not an expert and Michael can clarify, but sanity check basically means repoman does not check out. That is, the developer did not provide a proper stable list or target and potentially breaks the stable tree. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |
Archives