Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Christoph Junghans <ottxor@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed: dev-libs/icu
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:34:28
Message-Id: CANgp9kxFr7=wjhOwMRKP-esSaFYidDGfi0js-Ggn-Yj-eRjQog@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed: dev-libs/icu by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 2012/10/29 Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>:
2 > On 29/10/2012 10:37, Christoph Junghans wrote:
3 >> If Arfrever keeps maintaining it for a while, I will take it.
4 >
5 > Do remember that whatever you commit, _You_ take responsibility for it.
6 > After a screwup, the answer "I didn't do anything, I just committed what
7 > Arfrever gave me" is not a good answer.
8 Ok, I should have been more precise here. I will take it, but as I am
9 new to the insides of icu, it will take me a bit to
10 understand/fix/workaround it's issues and for that time having
11 Arfrever will be more than useful.
12
13 > In particular, if I hear such an answer from anybody (be it for icu or
14 > something else, be it for a minor inconsistency or a total fuckup), I'll
15 > be requesting devrel to re-evaluate their commit rights, as they are
16 > missing the understanding of "you're responsible for whatever you commit".
17 Please, go ahead. I am happy with having less rights and less responsibilities.
18
19 >
20 > --
21 > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
22 > flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
23 >
24
25
26
27 --
28 Christoph Junghans
29 http://dev.gentoo.org/~ottxor/

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed: dev-libs/icu Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>