| 1 |
On Friday 10 November 2006 16:28, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 08:56 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Ok, the list definitely isn't accurate. If there is a legitimate reason |
| 4 |
> > to mask sylpheed-claws-1.x you also have to mask it's reverse deps. |
| 5 |
> > However I'm still waiting for the explanation why it is on that list. |
| 6 |
> > (I don't mind if it's masked for a good reason, but I need to know |
| 7 |
> > that reason). |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> There is no immediate reason, of course. However, gtk+-1 and glib-1 |
| 10 |
> will be removed as soon after the big cleanup as is feasible, and |
| 11 |
> sylpheed-clasws-1.x is a gtk+-1 app, and therefore must go as well. I |
| 12 |
> didn't generate the list, but my understanding was that it was intended |
| 13 |
> to include all packages with a hard dep on gtk+-1, in addition to gnome |
| 14 |
> 1.x. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Gtk1 actually is broken for --as-needed. It's linking is broken thanks to a |
| 17 |
libtool which refuses to link against a non-installed libgdk. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Paul |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 23 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 24 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 25 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives