| 1 |
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 08:56 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Ok, the list definitely isn't accurate. If there is a legitimate reason |
| 4 |
> to mask sylpheed-claws-1.x you also have to mask it's reverse deps. |
| 5 |
> However I'm still waiting for the explanation why it is on that list. |
| 6 |
> (I don't mind if it's masked for a good reason, but I need to know |
| 7 |
> that reason). |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
There is no immediate reason, of course. However, gtk+-1 and glib-1 |
| 11 |
will be removed as soon after the big cleanup as is feasible, and |
| 12 |
sylpheed-clasws-1.x is a gtk+-1 app, and therefore must go as well. I |
| 13 |
didn't generate the list, but my understanding was that it was intended |
| 14 |
to include all packages with a hard dep on gtk+-1, in addition to gnome |
| 15 |
1.x. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Daniel |
Archives