| 1 |
On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 16:46, Jani Monoses wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> and to what should it upgrade if the only ebuild that is newer is marked |
| 5 |
> as unstable while the ones which were stable were deleted? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
Then ofcourse it wouln't upgrade (that's the idea). That's why I asked |
| 8 |
you if it was because of the downgrading you complained. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
p.s. this issue belongs in gentoo-user or in the apropriate forum IMHO. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
p.p.s. I've posted this to the gentoo-dev list too - so everyone can |
| 13 |
follow the thread - and other people with same problem might find the |
| 14 |
answer to the same question by searching. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> > On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 11:06, Jani Monoses wrote: |
| 17 |
> > > Hi |
| 18 |
> > > I have s 0.8.8 installed and an update would go back to 0.8.5-r1 |
| 19 |
> > > because 0.8.11 is masked and other ebuilds have been deleted so the |
| 20 |
> > > greatest stable is 0.8.5 |
| 21 |
> > > while this is probably an accident it would be good if portage would |
| 22 |
> > > not allow such inconsistencies to happen. |
| 23 |
> > > |
| 24 |
> > you mean not downgrading? then just use -Uu instead of just -u - then |
| 25 |
> > it won't try to downgrade. |
| 26 |
> > -- |
| 27 |
> > Regards, |
| 28 |
> > Klavs Klavsen, GSEC - kl@××××.dk - http://www.vsen.dk |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> > Working with Unix is like wrestling a worthy opponent. |
| 31 |
> > Working with windows is like attacking a small whining child |
| 32 |
> > who is carrying a .38. |
| 33 |
> > |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Regards, |
| 36 |
Klavs Klavsen, GSEC - kl@××××.dk - http://www.vsen.dk |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Working with Unix is like wrestling a worthy opponent. |
| 39 |
Working with windows is like attacking a small whining child |
| 40 |
who is carrying a .38. |
Archives