Archives
Archives
| From: | "Santiago M. Mola" <coldwind@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: EAPI definition Was: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) | ||
| Date: | Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:27:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | 3c32af40712280425x1d740306vd2669f518ae220ca@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: EAPI definition Was: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | On Dec 28, 2007 1:03 PM, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 2 | <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > There's no particular reason that new |
| 5 | > version formats can't be introduced in a new EAPI so long as the |
| 6 | > version strings don't appear in ebuilds using older EAPIs or in |
| 7 | > profiles. Ditto for naming rules. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Errr... so should we use new files in profiles for such new formats? |
| 11 | (for example, p.masking an ebuild with a new version format). |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Santiago M. Mola |
| 15 | Jabber ID: cooldwind@×××××.com |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: EAPI definition Was: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> |