1 |
On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 09:14:14 -0400 |
2 |
Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 14:45 +0200, Michael Weber wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > What are the reasons to stable 3.8 and not 3.6, a version w/o this |
7 |
> > restriction, enabling all non systemd users to profit from this |
8 |
> > eye-candy as well. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > I raise the freedom of choice card here. And deliberately choosing |
11 |
> > an uncooperative version doesn't shine a good light. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> To stabilize gnome-3.6, we would need |
14 |
> |
15 |
> 1. one or (preferably) two *active* gentoo developers; |
16 |
> 2. who are familiar with gnome's internals and are able to backport |
17 |
> bugfixes from 3.8/3.10 without support from upstream developers; and |
18 |
> 3. who volunteer to run openrc+gnome-3.6 for a long time on their main |
19 |
> machines so that they can give a stable 3.6 the support that the word |
20 |
> 'stable' implies. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> We do not have such people on the gnome team. |
23 |
|
24 |
There's going to be a lot of complaints and rant about this, some of |
25 |
which has already started in some places like the forums; as far as I |
26 |
see I barely see people raising their hands to put in the work. At most |
27 |
I recall some work here and there by one or two individuals, but in all |
28 |
seriousness I don't think that's enough to pull it off. |
29 |
|
30 |
While people can scream, complaint and rant all they want about choice; |
31 |
it isn't going to happen if nobody is going to implement it, until that |
32 |
happens following whatever upstream does is the only reasonable thing |
33 |
to do. Or if you really want to help, help implement the choice... :) |
34 |
|
35 |
It's not enough to just re-introduce support as well as to port back |
36 |
part of that support, which they don't seem to even have currently for |
37 |
3.8; it goes a lot further than that, as mentioned by tetromino, the |
38 |
fixes have to be ported back as well. |
39 |
|
40 |
Let's say if they ignore all that and do stabilize 3.6; then they are |
41 |
just moving this problem, because then they won't end up getting 3.8 or |
42 |
later stabilized in the future because of the same objection. |
43 |
|
44 |
Using systemd and GNOME 3.8.3 on a daily basis, I haven't been able to |
45 |
run the entire 3.6 and 3.8 until a late fix [1] that took me weeks to |
46 |
find in all the seas of debugging information I have enabled; there are |
47 |
some other reports of users having similar and other issues, so I deem |
48 |
fixes like those are necessary for stabilization. Because really, they |
49 |
shouldn't be stabilizing something they know is heavily broken for some |
50 |
users; thus in its current state, 3.6 isn't really a good candidate. |
51 |
|
52 |
[1]: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704286 |
53 |
|
54 |
-- |
55 |
With kind regards, |
56 |
|
57 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
58 |
Gentoo Developer |
59 |
|
60 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
61 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
62 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |