Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Paweł Hajdan
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] avoiding urgent stabilizations
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:08:50
Message-Id: 4D529FC2.4060507@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] avoiding urgent stabilizations by Rich Freeman
1 On 2/9/11 2:57 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > Perhaps we should target having glsas published within a certain
3 > amount of time after a vulnerability is disclosed, whether corrected
4 > or not. We could re-publish a final notice once all is well. We
5 > really shouldn't consider users safe from a security vulnerability
6 > until the vulnerability is patched in the tree AND the notice to
7 > update has been sent out.
8
9 I think http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/vulnerability-policy.xml
10 specifies the target delay, and also mentions temporary GLSAs.
11 Unfortunately, that process does not seem to be followed due to general
12 difficulty of drafting GLSAs (I don't even know what is the problem, as
13 GLSAmaker is only available to security team members).

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] avoiding urgent stabilizations Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>