| 1 |
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:22:19 -0700 |
| 2 |
Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> So where exactly is this "sky is falling" issue you're worried |
| 4 |
> about? Bugs happen. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
It means anyone using EAPI 2 now is going to encounter severe |
| 7 |
breakages with Pkgcore. Simply put, all your Pkgcore users are going to |
| 8 |
get screwed over very messily as soon as they try to use any EAPI 2 |
| 9 |
things. Is this not something we should be caring about? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Frankly you're overreacting on this- and that is assuming you *are* |
| 12 |
> overreacting instead of just going for a bit of a public smear |
| 13 |
> via bugs. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Bah. If you want me to lecture you on how you're being blatantly |
| 16 |
irresponsible and incompetent then I will do, although by the way you |
| 17 |
rush on the defensive and start trying to cover your ass by throwing |
| 18 |
accusations at me it looks like you already know it. But what I care |
| 19 |
about is getting the mess fixed in the most painless way possible. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
This is a real issue and developers need to know the implications. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> Either way, my vote is fix the bugs, leave EAPI2 as is, and in the |
| 24 |
> future kindly file bugs properly (preferably w/out the noise, but |
| 25 |
> I'll take usable bug reports in almost any form). |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
If you want bug reports via trac instead of IRC, get your trac to |
| 28 |
respond faster. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives