1 |
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 21:56:52 Matt Turner wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
3 |
> > Il giorno mer, 19/01/2011 alle 21.44 -0500, Mike Frysinger ha scritto: |
4 |
> >> you really need to start off discussions as "here is the problem i |
5 |
> >> perceive |
6 |
> >> and here is a solution i think will address it". shooting off e-mails |
7 |
> >> from on |
8 |
> >> high as an official edict without room for discussion is no way to run |
9 |
> >> a team. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > There is nothing new or revolutionary in what I said — are you trying to |
12 |
> > challenge the need for traceability of distfiles? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Good grief. No. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> He seems to be simply stating that you'd do better to say "we have a |
17 |
> problem with $this and I think it'd be fixed with $that" instead of |
18 |
> "This is to be considered QA policy, so we're going to ask soon to |
19 |
> enforce this." |
20 |
|
21 |
pretty much. no point in getting your panties in a bunch. |
22 |
|
23 |
here's a better idea: figure out something with the infra team. we havent |
24 |
hosted files on dev.g.o because we've felt the distfiles tree to be |
25 |
sufficient. since there seems to be more need now, let's find out what infra |
26 |
can do to help out. |
27 |
|
28 |
again, declaring policy ahead of talking to anyone else is not the way to go. |
29 |
-mike |