| 1 |
Thomas Pani wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> The real issue here is the size. If these additional packages plus all of |
| 5 |
>> the alsa modules add 20MB to the minimal CD, it's just not worth it. It's |
| 6 |
>> not "minimal" anymore. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> Could you elaborate whom that change would affect (negatively)? 83MB |
| 10 |
> for current x86 isn't really "minimal" any more, anyway. |
| 11 |
> I don't see the difference between 83MB and 103MB: |
| 12 |
> - Makes no difference on blank CD (even those minis have ~200MB). |
| 13 |
> - Regarding download size, well, after the CD you'll have to get the |
| 14 |
> stage tarball and most probably source tarballs as well. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> -- |
| 17 |
> Thomas Pani |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
For a person on dial-up, about 2 1/2 hours of additional download. That |
| 23 |
said, I'd be OK with the increase in size if it would help a person who |
| 24 |
can't see the screen. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Dale |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
:-) :-) |
Archives