Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for April 23
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 23:05:22
Message-Id: 200904210201.11341.hwoarang@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for April 23 by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Sunday 19 April 2009 18:14:36 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:10:50 +0200
3 >
4 > Peter Alfredsen <loki_val@g.o> wrote:
5 > > A reasonable default would be --disable-static. Then libs that have
6 > > in-tree consumers of their static libs could then make a use-flag,
7 > > users who need them could use EXTRA_ECONF="--enable-static".
8 >
9 > If you're going to do that, why not do it as an EAPI thing? This has
10 > the added bonus that there's a clean migration path...
11 +1 . I do like this approach instead of using a new use flag :)
12 --
13 Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
14 Gentoo Linux Developer
15 Qt/KDE/Sunrise/Sound
16 Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.gr

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature