Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for April 23 | ||
| Date: | Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:14:44 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20090419181436.3cbb9517@snowcone | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for April 23 by Peter Alfredsen |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:10:50 +0200 |
| 2 | Peter Alfredsen <loki_val@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > A reasonable default would be --disable-static. Then libs that have |
| 4 | > in-tree consumers of their static libs could then make a use-flag, |
| 5 | > users who need them could use EXTRA_ECONF="--enable-static". |
| 6 | |
| 7 | If you're going to do that, why not do it as an EAPI thing? This has |
| 8 | the added bonus that there's a clean migration path... |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for April 23 | Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for April 23 | Peter Alfredsen <loki_val@g.o> |