| 1 |
On 01/31/2011 07:04 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
>> 2. I don't think it makes sense for QA to discipline developers |
| 4 |
>> permanently in these cases. They should suspend access pending Devrel |
| 5 |
>> resolution of the issue. Devrel should of course strongly consider |
| 6 |
>> the input of QA. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> That should be anyone's input, really. If a Gentoo Linux user finds a |
| 9 |
> nasty `rm -rf /' timebomb, I suppose he could point that out to infra |
| 10 |
> directly. And it's infra that suspends access, by the way. And devrel |
| 11 |
> should be the intermediate between developers. And QA "aims to keep the |
| 12 |
> portage tree in a consistent state"[1]. Wait, everyone is already in |
| 13 |
> place? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Actually recruiters can also suspend commit access and DevRel lead has |
| 17 |
used that to safe guard the tree in the past. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Regards, |
| 20 |
Petteri |
Archives