Archives
Archives
| From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild | ||
| Date: | Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:27:15 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20111013172630.0ca7d1f5@pomiocik.lan | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:13:11 +0100 |
| 2 | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:23:07 +0200 |
| 5 | > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 | > > So qutecom is not broken and needs not be removed as long as |
| 7 | > > <linux-headers-2.6.38 is in the tree. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > Dependencies using <, <=, =, ~ or =* are broken, except in certain |
| 10 | > special situations inside ||. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | So, in your opinion, if we have 'foo' and 'libfoo' which are strictly |
| 13 | version-bound, we can't allow users to install older versions? |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | Best regards, |
| 17 | Michał Górny |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |