1 |
On 9/28/06, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote: |
4 |
> > Tach David, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > David Grant schrieb: |
7 |
> >> On 9/28/06, Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
> >>> +++ Mark Stier [28/09/06 15:35 +0200]: |
9 |
> >>>> How about entering the removed ebuilds into bugzilla under an |
10 |
> adequate |
11 |
> >>>> section? |
12 |
> >>> I think my original reply got lost, so just in case - seems like a |
13 |
> time |
14 |
> >>> for sunset overlays ;0 |
15 |
> >> or sunrise rather... |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > New packages not yet in the tree -> sunrise |
18 |
> > Old crufty packages removed from the tree -> sunset |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Got it? |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > V-Li |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> |
25 |
> There is a TreeCleaner Project overlay; but I was planning on placing |
26 |
> tools in it; I may be convinced to add the ebuilds (and their files) |
27 |
> that we clean to it; assuming it doesn't take anyone that long to do it; |
28 |
> the problem being for some things that live only on our mirrors; the |
29 |
> ebuilds won't work as the files get purged after two weeks. Let me |
30 |
> consider this though; if we can script it somehow it would maybe benefit |
31 |
> others (a treecleaner poopy overlay for Layman also...) |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
That would be an awesome idea. I have never been a fan of cleaned ebuilds |
36 |
moving to the CVS attic and I have had to fetch some old ebuild and |
37 |
associated patches from the portage's CVS Attic on 2 occasions and it was a |
38 |
major pain. |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
David Grant |
43 |
http://www.davidgrant.ca |