Archives
Archives
| From: | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilization commits and atomicity | ||
| Date: | Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:40:41 | ||
| Message-Id: | 56252B09.4030103@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilization commits and atomicity by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | On 10/19/2015 07:37 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > However, stabilizing a single package really is an impactful change. |
| 4 | > The fact that you're doing 100 of them at one time doesn't really |
| 5 | > diminish the impact of each one. Any of them could break a system or |
| 6 | > need to be reverted. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Since when do we allow reverting stabilization? The package needs to be |
| 10 | fixed and possibly revbumped instead. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilization commits and atomicity | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |