1 |
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:07:09 +0100 |
2 |
Theo Chatzimichos <tampakrap@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> these days I am working on a puppet module for portage. For testing I |
5 |
> have created a dummy package which can be found here [1]. The package |
6 |
> installs files based on useflags, and it comes in stable, testing and |
7 |
> hardmasked versions, plus it has some useflag changes between |
8 |
> versions. With this package I can make sure that the puppet provider |
9 |
> does its various operations fine. I'm about to start writing unit |
10 |
> tests for that provider, and I would like to use that package for the |
11 |
> testing. It would be preferred to move that package in tree though. |
12 |
> Since the ebuilds are useless for everybody else, and maybe violate |
13 |
> policy about the stable tree, I'd like to know if there are any |
14 |
> objections to move it to tree. If there are none, I'll move it in one |
15 |
> month |
16 |
> |
17 |
> [1] https://github.com/gentoo-el/overlay/tree/master/app-misc/dummy |
18 |
|
19 |
To be honest, I don't mind having dummy packages in the tree. I would |
20 |
be happy to convert gentoopm sometime to use them instead of relying on |
21 |
random packages to match its criteria. |
22 |
|
23 |
However, I'd rather see them in a special category, and preferably |
24 |
prefixed with 'gentoo-' to make it least possible for any kind of name |
25 |
collisions. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Best regards, |
29 |
Michał Górny |