| 1 |
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: |
| 2 |
> I have updated the GLEP, hopefully it is less confusing now and hence |
| 3 |
> the discussion will be more technical. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> As I still didn't get the "ok to commit" from our glep folks, read the |
| 6 |
> most current version here: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~peper/glep-0055.html |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~peper/glep-0055.txt |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Haven't read the previous discussion, apologies if this has been |
| 13 |
clarified already, but I think it would be good to answer the following |
| 14 |
question in the GLEP: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Why (in terms of your GLEP) are you still allowing ebuilds to set EAPI |
| 17 |
inside the ebuild? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
It seems that one approach you might take is to move the EAPI selection |
| 20 |
into the filename and remove it from the ebuild itself, and it's not |
| 21 |
clear to me why your proposal isn't exactly that. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Thanks, |
| 24 |
Daniel |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives