Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 21:19:53
Message-Id: 4E99F8C6.1060601@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying by "Paweł Hajdan
On 10/16/2011 12:00 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 10/15/11 2:42 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 03:54, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: >>> That would be an ok approach from my perspective: We could just change >>> line 14 of python.eclass and let package maintainers report breakage as >>> they increment EAPI. I am confident that nothing EAPI <= 3 would break. >>> >>> Is anyone (especially djc and the python herd members) opposed to this? >> >> Seems fine to me; I can't really think of a practical better way. > > Thank you, change committed to CVS then. Hopefully nobody will get upset > about this. > > I'll wait a few days before I start using EAPI-4 in ebuilds using > python.eclass, but I've done local tests and everything works fine (for > the ebuild I (co-)maintain). >
Thanks, this is most appericiated. This allowed me to kill EAPI=3 support from xfconf.eclass.