| 1 |
Another useflag-related question. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Currently, the encode useflag is defined as follow: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
encode - Adds support for MEncoder or LaME encoder, wherever applicable |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
this is a loose definition which is quite useless for medium user, as it's |
| 8 |
used also in a non-complete-standard way in all ebuilds. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
My proposal is to start using lame useflag to enable lame support (in software |
| 11 |
which is just encoding on itself), and using encode with a slight different |
| 12 |
definition for example: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
encode - Adds support for encoding files in addiction to decoding |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
so that it can be used to enable generic encoding support instead of specific |
| 17 |
using lame or mencoder. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Comments? |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò |
| 22 |
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ |
Archives