Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: CJ Kucera <pez@××××××××××××.com>
To: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] No XFree86 w/ new license
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:13:29
Message-Id: 20040218151326.GA21551@unisrv.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] No XFree86 w/ new license by Paul de Vrieze
1 On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 03:56:10PM +0100, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
2 > We also sell livecd's. Further we have mirrors that distribute xfree and
3 > iso's that include xfree. As X is a quite necessary package we also
4 > cannot really remove it from the GRP package list either. In short, we
5 > have big problems with this too, although I agree that we are in a
6 > better position than binary distributions.
7
8 Yeah, I figured that livecds and GRP packages would have to stay at
9 the 4.3 version. But I'm still a bit hazy on what would prevent a
10 simple ebuild from living in Portage's tree. It seems to me that,
11 among the 300+ licenses which *are* acceptable in Portage, this new
12 one couldn't be the "worst" of them. Wasn't there some work being
13 done to provide an "ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES" var or something? So
14 someone not wanting to deal with the extra requirements in the
15 new XFree license wouldn't have to worry about having it installed.
16
17 -CJ
18
19 --
20 WOW: Kakistocracy | "The ships hung in the sky in much the same
21 apocalyptech.com/wow | way that bricks don't." - Douglas Adams,
22 pez@××××××××××××.com | _The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy_
23
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] No XFree86 w/ new license Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>