1 |
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 03:56:10PM +0100, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
2 |
> We also sell livecd's. Further we have mirrors that distribute xfree and |
3 |
> iso's that include xfree. As X is a quite necessary package we also |
4 |
> cannot really remove it from the GRP package list either. In short, we |
5 |
> have big problems with this too, although I agree that we are in a |
6 |
> better position than binary distributions. |
7 |
|
8 |
Yeah, I figured that livecds and GRP packages would have to stay at |
9 |
the 4.3 version. But I'm still a bit hazy on what would prevent a |
10 |
simple ebuild from living in Portage's tree. It seems to me that, |
11 |
among the 300+ licenses which *are* acceptable in Portage, this new |
12 |
one couldn't be the "worst" of them. Wasn't there some work being |
13 |
done to provide an "ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES" var or something? So |
14 |
someone not wanting to deal with the extra requirements in the |
15 |
new XFree license wouldn't have to worry about having it installed. |
16 |
|
17 |
-CJ |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
WOW: Kakistocracy | "The ships hung in the sky in much the same |
21 |
apocalyptech.com/wow | way that bricks don't." - Douglas Adams, |
22 |
pez@××××××××××××.com | _The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy_ |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |