Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: voip@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About unresolved bugs assigned to voip for ages
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 06:14:49
Message-Id: 1349936028.2509.0.camel@belkin4
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About unresolved bugs assigned to voip for ages by "Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)"
1 El mié, 10-10-2012 a las 20:11 -0400, Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) escribió:
2 > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
3 > <chithanh@g.o> wrote:
4 > > Pacho Ramos schrieb:
5 > >>>>>> I am noticing for a long time that bugs related with ekiga,
6 > >>>>>> opal, yate... are completely unattended by voip team for
7 > >>>>>> years. If nobody from that team is willing to maintain
8 > >>>>>> them, please move them to maintainer-needed to, at least,
9 > >>>>>> reflect reality.
10 > >
11 > >> Any news here? I can move that packages to maintainer-needed if you
12 > >> send me the list of packages you don't want to maintain. Also,
13 > >> maybe telepathy stuff could be moved to its own herd (that is
14 > >> basically gnome team + tester... or maybe tester could join gnome
15 > >> team ;))
16 > >
17 > > There is now one proxy maintainer for a couple of packages, he is
18 > > currently waiting for voip overlay access in bug 437538. He will take
19 > > care of linphone and related packages (see bug 399735 and its
20 > > dependencies).
21 > >
22 > > Regarding the packages that can be moved to maintainer-needed: I think
23 > > a good heuristic is if the package has several open bugs with no
24 > > maintainer reaction, and hasn't been touched by anyone from voip herd
25 > > in over a year. This would include the ekiga, opal and yate packages
26 > > mentioned above.
27 > >
28 > I'd gladly take maintainership of opal and ekiga, if nobody wants them.
29 >
30 > Cheers,
31 >
32
33 Would be nice as they need a lot of bumps and pending work

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies