1 |
El mié, 10-10-2012 a las 20:11 -0400, Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) escribió: |
2 |
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
3 |
> <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > Pacho Ramos schrieb: |
5 |
> >>>>>> I am noticing for a long time that bugs related with ekiga, |
6 |
> >>>>>> opal, yate... are completely unattended by voip team for |
7 |
> >>>>>> years. If nobody from that team is willing to maintain |
8 |
> >>>>>> them, please move them to maintainer-needed to, at least, |
9 |
> >>>>>> reflect reality. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> >> Any news here? I can move that packages to maintainer-needed if you |
12 |
> >> send me the list of packages you don't want to maintain. Also, |
13 |
> >> maybe telepathy stuff could be moved to its own herd (that is |
14 |
> >> basically gnome team + tester... or maybe tester could join gnome |
15 |
> >> team ;)) |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > There is now one proxy maintainer for a couple of packages, he is |
18 |
> > currently waiting for voip overlay access in bug 437538. He will take |
19 |
> > care of linphone and related packages (see bug 399735 and its |
20 |
> > dependencies). |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > Regarding the packages that can be moved to maintainer-needed: I think |
23 |
> > a good heuristic is if the package has several open bugs with no |
24 |
> > maintainer reaction, and hasn't been touched by anyone from voip herd |
25 |
> > in over a year. This would include the ekiga, opal and yate packages |
26 |
> > mentioned above. |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> I'd gladly take maintainership of opal and ekiga, if nobody wants them. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Cheers, |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
Would be nice as they need a lot of bumps and pending work |