| 1 |
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 2 |
<chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Pacho Ramos schrieb: |
| 4 |
>>>>>> I am noticing for a long time that bugs related with ekiga, |
| 5 |
>>>>>> opal, yate... are completely unattended by voip team for |
| 6 |
>>>>>> years. If nobody from that team is willing to maintain |
| 7 |
>>>>>> them, please move them to maintainer-needed to, at least, |
| 8 |
>>>>>> reflect reality. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> Any news here? I can move that packages to maintainer-needed if you |
| 11 |
>> send me the list of packages you don't want to maintain. Also, |
| 12 |
>> maybe telepathy stuff could be moved to its own herd (that is |
| 13 |
>> basically gnome team + tester... or maybe tester could join gnome |
| 14 |
>> team ;)) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> There is now one proxy maintainer for a couple of packages, he is |
| 17 |
> currently waiting for voip overlay access in bug 437538. He will take |
| 18 |
> care of linphone and related packages (see bug 399735 and its |
| 19 |
> dependencies). |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Regarding the packages that can be moved to maintainer-needed: I think |
| 22 |
> a good heuristic is if the package has several open bugs with no |
| 23 |
> maintainer reaction, and hasn't been touched by anyone from voip herd |
| 24 |
> in over a year. This would include the ekiga, opal and yate packages |
| 25 |
> mentioned above. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
I'd gladly take maintainership of opal and ekiga, if nobody wants them. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Cheers, |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) |
| 33 |
Gentoo Developer |
Archives