Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gtk-sharp-module.eclass
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:55:17
Message-Id: pan.2008.11.27.00.53.47@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gtk-sharp-module.eclass by Peter Alfredsen
1 Peter Alfredsen <loki_val@g.o> posted
2 200811262038.42168.loki_val@g.o, excerpted below, on Wed, 26 Nov
3 2008 20:38:39 +0100:
4
5 > This isn't a catch-all eclass. It's designed for a very narrow group of
6 > ebuilds which will only get smaller as I transition the packages to
7 > eapi-2 and use depends.
8
9 In that case, it may be better to do the limited code duplication, given
10 the relative permanence of eclasses. They gotta stick around long after
11 any ebuilds using them are gone, altho with newer portage (and I'd hope
12 other PMs as well) that isn't /quite/ the problem it used to be.
13
14 --
15 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
16 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
17 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman

Replies