1 |
Alright, well I appreciate all the thought and discussion that |
2 |
exploded about this problem. The pidgin team appreciates it. Though |
3 |
I'm sorry to say I'm not up to speed with all this Gentoo talk. I |
4 |
gather that when IUSE defaults come out, the ability to specify |
5 |
default USE flags on a per package basis will be available in the |
6 |
ebuild, but other than that I'm somewhat lost as to what was just |
7 |
talked about. Can someone break it down for a simple user/would like |
8 |
to be maintainer someday, so that I can have a better cleaner answer |
9 |
to bring back to the pidgin team. |
10 |
|
11 |
Thanks again, |
12 |
Eric |
13 |
|
14 |
On 7/19/07, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> wrote: |
15 |
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:08:20 +0200 |
16 |
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com> wrote: |
17 |
> > So just start using IUSE defaults! There's no problem with doing it |
18 |
> > at once since it can be considered as a part of EAPI=0. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> No, IUSE defaults are EAPI 1. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> -- |
23 |
> Ciaran McCreesh |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
http://aluink.blogspot.com |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
"...indexable arrays, which may be thought of as functions whose |
34 |
domains are isomorphic to contiguous subsets of the integers." |
35 |
--Haskell 98 Library Report |
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |