| 1 |
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 06:32:29PM +0200 or thereabouts, Spider wrote: |
| 2 |
> begin quote |
| 3 |
> On Fri, 24 May 2002 10:11:20 -0500 |
| 4 |
> JR Boyens <jboyens@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > I think that a list of these packages would be very nice so that those |
| 7 |
> > of us who have nothing better to do could start fixing these ebuild to |
| 8 |
> > depend on the right versions. Also a "Orphaned Ebuilds" list would be |
| 9 |
> > nice as well. :) |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Orphaned I dont know about, but the gtk+ ones... |
| 13 |
> grep -r ">=x11-libs/gtk+" /usr/portage/ |
| 14 |
> grep -r " x11-libs/gtk+ " /usr/portage/ |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
So which one is correct? Should it depend on "=x11-libs/gtk+-1.2"? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> there you go :) |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> //Spider |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> -- |
| 28 |
> begin .signature |
| 29 |
> This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 30 |
> See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 31 |
> end |
Archives