1 |
Hrmm, basically the way things used to work was that a complaint was |
2 |
filed, looked into, and dealt with by the devrel leads. That did not |
3 |
work, I'll be the first to admit that one, and it didn't work largely |
4 |
because things were not documented well at all. |
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
I'm proposing basically what's already in the proposal, accept that |
8 |
those say...5 people have the right to look into things and make their |
9 |
recommendation. It might help things if i put together a written |
10 |
proposal to make things clearer. I've not had time to get that far yet. |
11 |
|
12 |
Basically, this sisposes with the judicual/investigation team consepts |
13 |
though, and makes things much easier to track. |
14 |
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
15 |
|
16 |
> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 13:41:24 -0400 |
17 |
> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
18 |
> Reply-To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o |
19 |
> To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o |
20 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc |
21 |
> |
22 |
> On Tuesday 06 September 2005 12:19 pm, Deedra Waters wrote: |
23 |
>> A lot of people have told me after the fact that having seperate |
24 |
>> judicial and investigative branches make things too complicated and the |
25 |
>> end result is too much red tape. Some disagree and think that things |
26 |
>> won't/aren't too complicated. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> well, this sounds like moving back to the 'way it was' right ? we've seen |
29 |
> that way doesnt work quite so well, while the new way hasnt really been |
30 |
> tested |
31 |
> |
32 |
>> Basically, for the most part, the transparency of how complaints are |
33 |
>> handled stays the same. The only thing i really want to change, is that |
34 |
>> i think that a commitee of say 3 to 5 people handles a complaint from |
35 |
>> beginning to end. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> so you're talking about merely reducing numbers here rather than changing |
38 |
> anything else about how the complaint process is handledright ? all other |
39 |
> aspects of the process in terms of what needs to be done (investigate, |
40 |
> communication, council balance check, etc...) are unchanged ? |
41 |
> |
42 |
> i'm not saying i agree with the idea, i just want to be sure of the exact |
43 |
> details of the proposal |
44 |
> -mike |
45 |
> |
46 |
|
47 |
-- |
48 |
Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure - |
49 |
dmwaters@g.o |
50 |
Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org |
51 |
|
52 |
-- |
53 |
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list |