Archives
Archives
| From: | Janusz Syrytczyk <jsyrytczyk@×××××××××.pl> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-embedded@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-embedded] Embedded stage - why kernels and headers 2.4 not 2.6? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:23:32 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200712130122.15121.jsyrytczyk@uni.opole.pl | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-embedded] Embedded stage - why kernels and headers 2.4 not 2.6? by Janusz Syrytczyk |
||
| 1 | > Why all kernels below 2.5 are ok and others are masked? |
| 2 | |
| 3 | You look, you find: |
| 4 | |
| 5 | "unlike the default-linux and standard hardened profiles we felt it |
| 6 | unneeded to force a 2.6 sub profile or we did not wish to have to |
| 7 | maintain twice as many profiles. Also all the last releases |
| 8 | were for all 2.4.x kernels. upgrading to 2.6.x is easy as -pie |
| 9 | however.. Just update headers, uclibc, kernel and modules. |
| 10 | Then go update everything else where needed. " |
| 11 | |
| 12 | by Ned Ludd-2 |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Janusz |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-embedded] Embedded stage - why kernels and headers 2.4 not 2.6? | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |