| 1 |
> upgrading to 2.6.x is easy as -pie however.. Just update |
| 2 |
> headers, uclibc, kernel and modules. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Yeah, i thought so. I just wanted to make sure! |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Thanks for your help! |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
2006/7/27, Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>: |
| 13 |
> On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 22:23 +0100, Marcelo Coelho wrote: |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> > I'm trying to set up a uclibc hardened system and the only profile i |
| 16 |
> > have is for a 2.4 kernel. |
| 17 |
> > There is the hardened sources which is a 2.6 |
| 18 |
> > kernel so why there isn't a 2.6 profile? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> unlike the default-linux and standard hardened profiles we felt it |
| 21 |
> unneeded to force a 2.6 sub profile or we did not wish to have to |
| 22 |
> maintain twice as many profiles. Also all the last releases |
| 23 |
> were for all 2.4.x kernels. upgrading to 2.6.x is easy as -pie |
| 24 |
> however.. Just update headers, uclibc, kernel and modules. |
| 25 |
> Then go update everything else where needed. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> -- |
| 29 |
> gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives