| 1 |
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 18:27 -0400, René Rhéaume wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Still probably no harm in having a minimalistic perl around in the |
| 3 |
> > portage tree. We just cant promote such ideas and being any part of |
| 4 |
> > proper embedded solutions due to file size and memory/cpu consumption |
| 5 |
> > that goes along with using perl itself. |
| 6 |
> Exactly, I would like a minimalistic Perl, not pushing Perl into |
| 7 |
> embedded systems really. I just thought embedded projects like cutting |
| 8 |
> the fat. Sorry for the inconvenience my wording caused. As miniperl |
| 9 |
> means trouble, I will try the perl-base way. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
You should file a bug at bugs.gentoo.org for perl@gentoo when you have |
| 12 |
ebuild patches ready to go. You will probably want to key this |
| 13 |
functionality on the minimal USE flag perhaps. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives