| 1 |
> Still probably no harm in having a minimalistic perl around in the |
| 2 |
> portage tree. We just cant promote such ideas and being any part of |
| 3 |
> proper embedded solutions due to file size and memory/cpu consumption |
| 4 |
> that goes along with using perl itself. |
| 5 |
Exactly, I would like a minimalistic Perl, not pushing Perl into |
| 6 |
embedded systems really. I just thought embedded projects like cutting |
| 7 |
the fat. Sorry for the inconvenience my wording caused. As miniperl |
| 8 |
means trouble, I will try the perl-base way. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Weather putting autotools on an embedded system is |
| 12 |
> wrong or not... you can build a very small version of |
| 13 |
> Perl if you are using uClibc. Then just control which |
| 14 |
> perl packages you emerge. |
| 15 |
I was writing about the main Perl package only, not the extra CPAN modules. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives