| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> You can post html, thats fine. You do risk people not reading it though, |
| 4 |
>> because they're lazy, like me and don't want to open an external viewer. |
| 5 |
>> People still do use text clients, you know. |
| 6 |
I strongly prefer text email as well, it conveys exactly the information I |
| 7 |
want it to convey and does not come with the "feature" of email authors being |
| 8 |
able to select their own favorite fonts and colour schemes. And yes, I know |
| 9 |
that clients can override that, but what's the point in using HTML if you do? |
| 10 |
:-p |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Anyway, I wasn't planning on starting the next holy war, so let's answer your |
| 13 |
question. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> Genuine question - does Mutt not have an inline html filter/viewer? I use |
| 16 |
> claws on an N810 which seems to handle html fine, but never really got into |
| 17 |
> mutt myself? |
| 18 |
I'm using mutt and it's not handling html itself. However, it can open html |
| 19 |
parts just as any attachment, and my mailcap says it should use lynx (or w3m?) |
| 20 |
to open text/html files. So, selecting the html part and pressing enter is |
| 21 |
enough to get a reasonable readable version of HTML emails. Still, it's enough |
| 22 |
to significantly break the routine in my work process, so half of the time I |
| 23 |
don't bother. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Gr. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Matthijs |
Archives