1 |
On 30 Jul 2004, Ned Ludd wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 11:44, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
4 |
> > On Friday 30 July 2004 12:57 am, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
5 |
> > > On Thursday 29 July 2004 11:05 am, Natanael Copa wrote: |
6 |
> > > > host fails to compile: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > ok, it's because uclibc curently doesnt implement all the resolve functions, |
9 |
> > but the header file says it does :) |
10 |
> > basically you're up the creek until uclibc gets code for those functions |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > > i know i found an issue where rpc symbols arent being defined in libc |
13 |
|
14 |
which functions are missing? |
15 |
|
16 |
_res_query or similar? you need uClibc cvs. |
17 |
|
18 |
> > |
19 |
> |
20 |
> > and this is because our cvs snapshot is outdated :) |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Our cvs snapshot is current now in uclibc-0.9.26-r4. |
23 |
> There is one patch may or may not fail so please test on arm. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I had to short circuit the noexecstack patch. |
26 |
> That patch ensures that the target executables get marked with proper |
27 |
> PT_GNU_STACK behavior vs having full RWE segments. |
28 |
> We need an update from psm@gmx, and upstream merging is desired. |
29 |
|
30 |
update for what? |
31 |
|
32 |
Peter |
33 |
|
34 |
> |
35 |
> I changed none of the _RPC_ values in the ebuild so nfs config options |
36 |
> in uclibc will have to be figured out by you as well as optional a |
37 |
> [rpc?] USE flag. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> > -mike |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> > -- |
42 |
> > gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
43 |
> |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net> ID: 0xA5F059F2 |
47 |
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2 |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
____________________________________________________________________ |
51 |
Miert fizetsz az internetert? Korlatlan, ingyenes internet hozzaferes a FreeStarttol. |
52 |
Probald ki most! http://www.freestart.hu |
53 |
|
54 |
-- |
55 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |