| 1 |
wireless wrote: |
| 2 |
> > There haven't been any more upstream releases, although there is |
| 3 |
> > definately upstream activity. I guess a git ebuild would be nice.. :) |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> http://openocd.berlios.de/web/?m=201002 |
| 6 |
> this shows version 0.4.0: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> OpenOCD v0.4.0 released Monday, February 22nd, 2010 |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> ARM looks to be the most active platform for openocd |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> portage has version ~0.3.1 |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Oh sorry! I forgot that not even 0.4.0 is in portage. :\ But I do |
| 15 |
suggest a git version. Upstream development is pretty stable. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
And! There *is* a git ebuild already, from March. I guess just unmask |
| 18 |
it and emerge. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
echo 'dev-embedded/openocd **' >> /etc/portage/package.keywords |
| 21 |
emerge openocd -av |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Yes you're right, ARM is the major platform and works well, but I |
| 24 |
don't believe it is meant to *only* do ARM. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
//Peter |
Archives