1 |
On Tuesday, September 14, 2010 19:44:20 Peter Stuge wrote: |
2 |
> wireless wrote: |
3 |
> > > There haven't been any more upstream releases, although there is |
4 |
> > > definately upstream activity. I guess a git ebuild would be nice.. :) |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > http://openocd.berlios.de/web/?m=201002 |
7 |
> > this shows version 0.4.0: |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > OpenOCD v0.4.0 released Monday, February 22nd, 2010 |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > ARM looks to be the most active platform for openocd |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > portage has version ~0.3.1 |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Oh sorry! I forgot that not even 0.4.0 is in portage. :\ But I do |
16 |
> suggest a git version. Upstream development is pretty stable. |
17 |
|
18 |
i guess someone should step up to be a maintainer for openocd. i have no |
19 |
personal interest in it as we use urjtag at my job, so that's what i watch |
20 |
over (up and down stream). |
21 |
-mike |