| 1 |
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 23:41 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: |
| 2 |
> The error message in subject is fairly good. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 01:55:37PM -0500, Jean-Claude Gervais wrote: |
| 6 |
> > I installed Gentoo on an AMD Geode by chrooting its flashcard hard-disk |
| 7 |
> > on a pentium4 machine. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > After installing everything and booting the system, I have exported |
| 10 |
> > the /usr/portage folder on my workstation so the Geode can continue to |
| 11 |
> > emerge programs without being taken offline and chrooted. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> .. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> > configure:1790: checking for C compiler default output file name |
| 16 |
> > configure:1793: i586-gentoo-linux-uclibc-gcc -Os conftest.c >&5 |
| 17 |
> > i586-gentoo-linux-uclibc-gcc: Internal error: Segmentation fault |
| 18 |
> > (program as) |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> as crashes. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> > CHOST="i586-gentoo-linux-uclibc" |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Is this really right? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Nothing wrong with that.. It's a perfectly valid CHOST= combo on Gentoo. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> How was binutils built? Perhaps try a different version. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Good suggestion. binutils-2.18 may be the cause of the problem.. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> Try pc instead of gentoo? |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Try gnu instead of uclibc? |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
These two would probably be a complete waste of his time/resources. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> //Peter |
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 46 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-- |
| 49 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives