Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-embedded@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-embedded] Cross Dev Tricks + Hardened questions | ||
| Date: | Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:16:35 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20091202001733.25376.qmail@stuge.se | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-embedded] Cross Dev Tricks + Hardened questions by Shinkan |
||
| 1 | Shinkan wrote: |
| 2 | > > Nod, metro. I've looked at it a little but so far not found big |
| 3 | > > benefits over catalyst for me. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Same to me. It seems weird. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | It's much less rigid is the point I guess. catalyst has some behavior |
| 8 | set by python code in /usr/lib and if you change that a lot then |
| 9 | metro might be a lot better I guess. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Also the metro equivalent of spec files are fun because AFAIU they |
| 12 | can call out to other programs, but it's not something I've needed. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | //Peter |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-embedded] Cross Dev Tricks + Hardened questions | Shinkan <shinkan@×××××.com> |