| 1 |
Previously you wrote: |
| 2 |
> Greetings, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I'm using HiTech-C for the first time. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I agree with both previous responses. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
If you insist on closed sources, look here: |
| 9 |
http://www.microchipc.com/ |
| 10 |
==> Pic C Sample Code and PIC FAQ |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
However, as one who has worked with traditional |
| 14 |
development environments for uP, here's my wisdom. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Ditch Hi-tech C immediately. It is garbage and you'll |
| 17 |
waist tons of time on things you should not. If you want |
| 18 |
to use a commercial compiler, then you have to decide. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Want a really good compiler for Microchip stuff? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
==> IAR, as they are THE GOLD STANDARD. www.iar.com |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Sure you pay, but, in the long run, you'll be |
| 25 |
thankful. Compilers for small micros are only as good |
| 26 |
as the folks that develop and support them. IAR |
| 27 |
is the best. Nobody else is even close. I know, as I use |
| 28 |
to be part of a team, that used everything you can image. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Now, if you're a hack, and CHEAP, which is a compliment, |
| 32 |
then get real and start learning how to use the open source |
| 33 |
compilers. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I'll dig out a few links of my PIC open source references |
| 36 |
and post it, if you like. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
hth, |
| 41 |
James |
Archives