| 1 |
On 04/07/10 21:22, wireless wrote: |
| 2 |
> Arkadi Shishlov wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 04/06/10 01:45, wireless wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> such, but, I'm thinking more along the Cortex A9 family |
| 5 |
>>> of processors.... |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>> http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu/wtbuproductcontent.tsp?templateId=6123&navigationId=12843&contentId=53243 |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Are they only available for professional developers of big companies right now? |
| 10 |
>> Must wait for BeagleBoard to migrate to OMAP4. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
>> BTW, if I want to hack on Tegra/Tegra2 or Snapdragon what is my option? Purchase |
| 13 |
>> a consumer device, which one? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Any suggestions? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> Once I get 'the sale pitch from TI' I'll post back, if you |
| 18 |
> like. I have a strong relationship with TI and they have not |
| 19 |
> dissapointed me in the past. I'm not sure what I'm after is |
| 20 |
> a dev board that is in the price range of the Beagle, but, |
| 21 |
> when I spin boards, the cost will approach the Beagle boards. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> If other have an interest, we could combine our needs and |
| 24 |
> spin a common board, then folks that want one, just pay me |
| 25 |
> for (my) cost on the boards. No layout or design time |
| 26 |
> charge, just trying to get the quantity up to a dozen or so... |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I'll keep that in mind, but I'm waiting for a more mainstream BB with A9. No |
| 29 |
rush. :) |
| 30 |
Please post your progress anyway. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> I put H.264 hardware solutions on the boards too, so that |
| 33 |
> runs up the costs. TI says it's very low now, but, I'm |
| 34 |
> waiting to hear my costs...... |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Isn't C64+ sufficient for H.264? Especially if its OMAP4? |
Archives