| 1 |
On 28 Jun 2004, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > > 2. missing parent file for uclibc |
| 4 |
> > done but I don't like it. |
| 5 |
> > I just don't buy that we _need_ less,net-tools,openssl,openssh,sash,nano |
| 6 |
> > into a base. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> The more and more I think about this.. |
| 9 |
> I really don't think we need alot of the cruft provided by 'base' |
| 10 |
> How about we drop 'base' and come up with a 'core' top level where we |
| 11 |
> drop things like openssl/openssh/iputils/net-tools and anything that |
| 12 |
> does not pertain to what's absolutely needed for a toolchain to rebuild |
| 13 |
> itself. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I have proposed this some time ago, but the answers I have gotten, said to |
| 16 |
better use base/packages and remove what I do not need. |
| 17 |
If we will replace most of the stuff w/ busybox and the baselayout-lite |
| 18 |
will work w/ it (haven't tested the lite version), then a core replacement |
| 19 |
would be more adequate. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
packages.build should be the minimal list |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
If you do that (new core), remove the parent and add all the required apps |
| 24 |
to uclibc/packages |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Peter |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives