| 1 |
> > I'm currently working on patch busybox udhcpc to support --env, which seems |
| 2 |
> > like the sensible solution to that problem. |
| 3 |
> Why not use the patch I made for Gentoo? |
| 4 |
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-misc/udhcp/files/udhcp-0.9.9_pre20041216-env.patch?view=markup |
| 5 |
Yeah, I've been basing on that, but most parts of it don't apply (the getopt |
| 6 |
handling in busybox is completely different, for example). So I'm rewriting |
| 7 |
the patch (keeping the actual code the same) to apply to the busybox udhcpc. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> > [Snip piece about runscript not creating the correct directories] |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Attached is a patch to correct this. Ugly, but will do for the time |
| 12 |
> being. |
| 13 |
Thanks, but I don't have need for a patch right now. As I said, when I use a |
| 14 |
proper inittab, instead of only running seperate init scripts, the problem |
| 15 |
does not occur. I'd only want this patched so it becomes a bit less confusing |
| 16 |
for other people. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Gr. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Matthijs |
Archives