1 |
Sorry, wrong list :) |
2 |
|
3 |
Christopher Friedt wrote: |
4 |
> Hi TS guys, |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Would you be willing to host a public Wiki & portage overlay? I've been |
7 |
> using portage for quite some time and now I can say that it's starting |
8 |
> to be quite easy to just 'emerge' packages for the TS boards. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I would definitely be willing to write the draft howto's to help |
11 |
> everyone else get started who was interested. And I would certainly be |
12 |
> willing to contribute any ebuilds and patches that I've already come |
13 |
> across. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Aside from building various kernels, modules, etc, what I've done so far |
16 |
> is: |
17 |
> |
18 |
> rebuild glibc userlands from scratch |
19 |
> rebuild uclibc userlands from scratch |
20 |
> (using the 2.6 linux kernel headers for compilation) |
21 |
> |
22 |
> created patches (mainly for +minimal installs) and corresponding ebuilds |
23 |
> |
24 |
> set up several preference files in /etc, like |
25 |
> /etc/portage/package.{use,mask,unmask} and also savedconfigs for uclibc |
26 |
> and busybox. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> The packages that I've emerged with all of my work range from basic |
29 |
> things like busybox and zlib to jamvm, gnu-classpath, ftp-servers, and |
30 |
> even custom software. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> After some level of stability has been reached, it's quite likely that |
33 |
> the gentoo people would host all of the howto documentation and even |
34 |
> merge some of the ebuild modifications into their own trees. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Does that sound like something TS would be willing to put up? |
38 |
> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> Cheers, |
41 |
> |
42 |
> ~/Chris |
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |