| 1 |
On Sep 3, 2013 10:32 PM, "Zenon D'Elée" <pid3.14159265@×××××.fr> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Thanks for the answer, and yes obviously this is the first place I will |
| 4 |
go. |
| 5 |
> My question was not enough precise, the following is maybe a bit more |
| 6 |
precise: |
| 7 |
> Is there any future improvements of the hardened project (other than bugs |
| 8 |
squashing) that needs help ? like for example new soft to |
| 9 |
> incorporate in hardened project ? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
There are many hardening aspects still untouched, but might not be easy to |
| 12 |
implement out of the blue. I'm thinking about mandatory access controls |
| 13 |
like SMACK or TOMOYO. Or dm-verity for block-level integrity. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Wkr, |
| 16 |
Sven |
Archives