| 1 |
Hi Sven, SMACK seems very interesting and far more complicated than SELinux, what kind of implementation are you thinking about regarding SMACK ? |
| 2 |
Anthony. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
________________________________ |
| 8 |
De : Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@××××××.be> |
| 9 |
À : gentoo-hardened@l.g.o |
| 10 |
Envoyé le : Mercredi 4 septembre 2013 7h29 |
| 11 |
Objet : Re: [gentoo-hardened] Any help needed ? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
On Sep 3, 2013 10:32 PM, "Zenon D'Elée" <pid3.14159265@×××××.fr> wrote: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Thanks for the answer, and yes obviously this is the first place I will go. |
| 19 |
> My question was not enough precise, the following is maybe a bit more precise: |
| 20 |
> Is there any future improvements of the hardened project (other than bugs squashing) that needs help ? like for example new soft to |
| 21 |
> incorporate in hardened project ? |
| 22 |
There are many hardening aspects still untouched, but might not be easy to implement out of the blue. I'm thinking about mandatory access controls like SMACK or TOMOYO. Or dm-verity for block-level integrity. |
| 23 |
Wkr, |
| 24 |
Sven |
Archives