| 1 |
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 23:43:33 +0100 |
| 2 |
Radoslaw Madej <radegand@××.pl> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hi Guys, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> For anyone interested, I'd like to announce that the second part of my |
| 7 |
> comparison between different Linux distros and their security features (which |
| 8 |
> includes Gentoo Hardened of course! ;) ) can be found here: |
| 9 |
> http://labs.mwrinfosecurity.com/notices/assessing_the_tux_strength_part_2_into_the_kernel/ |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> As always - all feedback is appreciated. Also please note that the previous |
| 12 |
> feedback is not to be forgotten and I shall address these ((-fstack-protector |
| 13 |
> vs. -fstack-protector-all, cookie strength and prelink) in my fourth post :) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Also - congrats to Zorry for becoming the new Gentoo Hardened lead and thanks |
| 16 |
> for all your support! :) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Regards, |
| 19 |
> Radek Madej |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
A very interesting article again my friend :) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
The randomisation bit was particularily interesting because as far as I |
| 25 |
understand that is one of the better security measures we can use. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Shame on fedora for only 3-bits randomisation for shared libs :P |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Mvh |
| 31 |
Daniel Kuehn, 073-181 577 2 |
| 32 |
Data@UrService |
| 33 |
Homepage: http://www.dataaturservice.se |
Archives